Almost immediately after President Obama announced that Elena Kagan was his choice to replace Justice Stevens on the U.S. Supreme Court, politicians and pundits started choosing sides. Many Democrats were quick to praise Kagan as a smart, qualified candidate who should get a quick confirmation, while Republicans pointed to her lack of judicial experience and ban on military recruiters while Dean of Harvard Law School as reasons to oppose her. Some liberals were unhappy with Obama’s selection, saying Kagan is not liberal enough and citing her advocacy for strong executive power. According to the NY Times, Sen. Tom Harkin (D. Kan.) asked on the website Politico “Why do the conservatives always get the conservatives, but we don’t get to get the liberals?”
Sen. Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, predicted an easy confirmation for Kagan, pointing to the 61 votes in her favor when she was confirmed as solicitor general last year. Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the committee, said he was “troubled” by Kagan’s lack of experience. Sessions said that there would be a different standard for a lifetime appointment, but conceded that he thought it likely the confirmation process would be over by the August recess. Sen. Susan Collins (R. Maine), who voted in favor of Kagan for Solicitor General, said "it can be very valuable to have an individual who has a background other than that of being a judge."
If confirmed, Kagan will be the only sitting justice without any prior judicial experience. But she will be the fifth Harvard Law School graduate, the third Princeton graduate, and the fourth New Yorker on the court. This will also be the first time the Court will have no Protestant members. Breyer, Ginsburg and Kagan are Jewish, while the six others are Catholic.